Consider that if there are five players at a single-deck table in Reno and you count the first round of cards, you will have seen approximately 33% of the deck. A Red Seven Count of +3 would indicate a player edge of about 2 1/2%. You will never see an edge like this after watching only one round of a 6-deck shoe game. In single-deck games, this occurs frequently. You do not need to use extensive strategy tables if you play only in such advantageous situations.
Single-deck games should be a gravy train for knowledgeable low stakes players. Playing multiple hands, you may be able to get more than 100 hands per hour by Wonging in on any plus count in the big South Tahoe casinos. This is a lot of action with quarter chips, and using the Red Seven Count, the player edge is about 1%. With the Zen Count, I would estimate a 1 1/2% edge. You can’t estimate your edge with any kind of precision for this approach because of the varying conditions—different numbers of players at the tables, various deck depletions, betting on various numbers of simultaneous hands, et cetera—but low stakes players should strive to play fewer hands at higher advantages. Just don’t try to get away with too much: If you see an edge of 6%, and in one-deck games that will happen, don’t forget that this is a low stakes strategy. A $50 or $60 bet could get you booted at some saw-dust joints.
casino online personnel are not ignorant of table-hopping, and just as there are many shoe games that disallow mid-shoe entry, there are some hand-held games that disallow mid-deck entry. One-deck Wonging works best when the crowd conditions are busy, and when your big bet is overshadowed by many other bets on the tables where you jump in. This strategy would easily beat The BJ Pays 6:5 games now popular in Las Vegas, but most of these tables have posted “No Mid-Deck Entry” signs.
Online Video Poker Games Online Casino GamesOnline Casino €/£/$800 Gaming Kasino Boni
Tags: blackjack, deck games, online casino
Tags: One of my favorite methods of depth-charging in Reno and Tahoe used to be to Wong it in crowded single-deck games, that is, table-hop and play only when the count is favorable. This is a depth-charging strategy that can be employed by card counters using any valid counting system, though this strategy is primarily for small stakes players.
In the big casinos, I had no trouble getting away with this strategy making single quarter ($25) bets. I've also done it with no heat betting single $20 bills. This style of play also works best when there are other big bettors at the table. If you bet a single quarter on a table where other players are betting multiple greens and blacks, no dealer will shuffle on you, nor will you get a second glance from the pit. If you jump around betting quarters where everyone else is betting nickels (or silver!), you are more likely to raise suspicion. Do not expect to get away with this strategy with black ($100) chips or stacks of quarters anywhere.
Playing a single hand, I was able to get an average of 38 hands every hour, table-hopping crowded single-deck games, and my average edge was about 3%. I also tried playing as many as three hands depending on how many spots I could grab, according to the number of players at the table and their positions. In sum, I got about 70 hands per hour, with an estimated edge of about 2%. I played at tables where at least three other players were playing, and usually there were four or five.
One problem I encountered was not always knowing how deeply into the deck the dealer had gone. Some of my bets were met with a shuffle-up, not because the dealer was paranoid about counters, but rather out of necessity. In such cases, I played through the hands and doubled my bet size or walked on the next round, depending on the count. I did not sit down to play, but stood behind the vacant seat. I never felt any heat.
Using the Red Seven Count, you should be able to get about 25 to 30 hands per hour, at an average edge of about 3%, by betting only at a running count of +3 or higher. Betting quarters, this means a potential gain of $20 per hour. It may seem like a slow grind, but for players on limited funds there is wisdom to playing hands only when you enjoy such a large edge. Your negative fluctuations will be considerably reduced, and playing 25 hands per hour with a 3% edge will win at the same rate as 75 hands per hour with a 1% edge.
After 100 hours of play with $25 bets, each approach would potentially net a win of $1,875. The player with the 3% edge, however, will have put one-third as much money into action as the 1 % edge player, who is playing three times faster. The faster player with the smaller edge would need a bankroll almost twice as large as the slow player to cope with his larger fluctuation.
Best Video Poker - How To Win At Video Poker Learn Video PokerOnline Casinos 320% Welcome Bonus
Tags: blackjack, card counters, online casino